Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 3049/2026 — snpen KI-generiert

Italian Court dismisses appeal as written hearing precludes adjournment due to lawyer absence.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 3049/2026 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal filed by El Mouaguine Hicham inadmissible and ordered him to pay procedural costs and a fine. The court reasoned that the lower court correctly determined the hearing was written in nature, meaning the defense lawyer's absence could not justify an adjournment. Consequently, the appeal failed to meet the procedural requirements for a hearing-based adjournment.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 340 c.p.p.; Art. 341 c.p.p.: When a hearing is conducted in writing, the absence of the defense lawyer does not constitute grounds for adjournment, and the appeal challenging this ruling is inadmissible.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Italian Criminal Procedure Written Hearing Nature Defense Lawyer Absence Adjournment Grounds Appeal Inadmissibility Rückzug des Rechtsvorschlags Zeugnisverweigerungsrecht Anspruch auf einen Entscheid

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 340 c.p.p.
Art. 341 c.p.p.
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 33902/2025 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to irrelevant ground and repetition of merits issues.
Ordinanza 373/1998
Constitutional challenge dismissed as inadmissible due to unclear formulation of the legal question regarding defense rights.
Ordinanza — n. 43789/2021 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to lack of lawyer representation and specific procedural rules.
Ordinanza — n. 22645/2022 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to lack of manifest illogical reasoning in lower court judgment.
Ordinanza 191/2000
Italian Constitutional Court dismisses challenge to lawyer strike rules as manifestly inadmissible due to procedural mismatch.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

a seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: EL MOUAOUINE HICHAM nato il 17/03/1979 avverso la sentenza del 06/05/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di TORINOdato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere ANGELO COSTANZO;MOTIVAZIONE Ritenuto che il ricorso di El Mouaguine non si confronta con la puntuale argomentazione con la quale la sentenza impugnata ha chiarito come l'astensione del difensore dalle udienze non potesse comportare il rinvio dell'udienza, giacché questa doveva svolgersi in forma scritta; ritenuto, pertanto,che il ricorso va dichiarato inammissibile con conseguente condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. P.Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 24/11/2025