Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of evidence due to lack of procedural exhaustion.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal lodged by the defendant against the lower court's ruling on evidence admissibility. The defendant argued that certain documentary evidence should be excluded because it was not properly served or cross-examined in the first instance. The court held that the procedural requirements for challenging evidence were not met, as the defendant failed to exhaust available remedies before seeking cassation.