Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 39221/2025 — snpen KI-generiert

Criminal appeal dismissed for failure to raise concurrence of crimes in second instance.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 39221/2025 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court declared the appellant's appeal inadmissible because the argument regarding the concurrence of crimes under Articles 337 and 341 bis of the Penal Code was not raised during the appeal proceedings. The appellant contended that the lower court failed to properly analyze the relationship between these offenses, but the court ruled that such issues are precluded by procedural law. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the appellant was ordered to pay court costs and a fine to the Fine Fund.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 337, 341 bis cod. pen.; The failure to deduce a specific ground of appeal in the second instance renders that argument precluded, barring its examination by the Supreme Court.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
concorso di reati preclusione appello Codice Penale ricorso inammissibile spese processuali Nichtigkeitsgründe Widerspruchsverfahren Verzicht auf mündliche Verhandlung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 337 cod. pen.
Art. 341 bis cod. pen.
Art. 596 c.p.p.
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 37451/2022 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal for generic censure on crimes of violence and threats under Italian Penal Code.
Ordinanza — n. 45336/2024 — snpen
Cassation dismisses appeal claiming defense rights violation due to charge reclassification under Art. 337 CP.
Ordinanza — n. 31165/2025 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal as arguments lack specificity and repeat merits court's correct reasoning.
Ordinanza — n. 24427/2024 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeals for inadmissibility as they challenge fact-finding reserved for trial judges.
Ordinanza — n. 2971/2026 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal as generic and repetitive of lower court's already evaluated evidence.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: MOUMOCO MADOU nato il 01/08/1989 avverso la sentenza del 15/10/2024 della CORTE APPELLO di GENOVAdato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI; R.G. n. 16710/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata (condanna per i reati previsti dagli artt. 337- 341 bis - 582 cod. pen.); Esaminato il motivo di ricorso, relativo al ritenuto concorso fra f i reati di cui agli artt. 337 e 341 bis cod. pen.; Ritenuto il motivo inammissibile perché non dedotto in appello e, quindi, precluso; Ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 26 settembre 2025.