Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 39211/2025 — snpen KI-generiert

Court dismisses appeal by defendant personally filing it, ordering payment of court costs and fines.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 39211/2025 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because it was filed personally by the defendant rather than through a proper legal representative. The lower court had convicted the appellant of the crime specified in Article 337 of the Penal Code, and the appellant argued for a review of this judgment. The supreme court ruled that personal filing violates procedural requirements, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and an order for the appellant to pay court expenses and a fine to the Fine Fund.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 337 cod. pen; Art. 360 c.p.p.: An appeal filed personally by the defendant is inadmissible, and the appellant must bear the costs and fines.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
personal appeal filing inadmissible appeal court costs award fine fund payment procedural defect defendant representation Cassazione ordinanza Kosten der unentgeltlichen Rechtspflege

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 337 cod. pen
16597/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata (condanna per il delitto di cui all'art. 337 cod.
Art. 360 c.p.p.
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 34096/2024 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to manifestly unfounded generic criticism of conviction.
Ordinanza — n. 35946/2024 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal for lack of specific argumentation against appellate court's sentencing reasoning.
Ordinanza — n. 50548/2023 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal as generic and fails to confront the lower court's reasoning on criminal liability.
Ordinanza — n. 42980/2022 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to improper grounds regarding evidence evaluation and sentencing excessiveness.
Ordinanza — n. 22144/2025 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal as generic and repetitive of lower court's already evaluated censure.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: LAGTIB MOHAMMED CUI 058NVPW nato il 28/03/2000 avverso la sentenza del 03/02/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di TORINOudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI; R.G. n. 16597/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata (condanna per il delitto di cui all'art. 337 cod. pen; Esaminati i motivi di ricorso; Ritenuto il ricorso• inammissibile perché proposto personalmente dall'imputato, con la conseguente condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 26 settembre 2025.