Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding admissibility of evidence in immigration detention proceedings due to procedural defects.

The Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal lodged by the applicant against the lower court's decision on the admissibility of evidence. The applicant argued that certain documents presented during the immigration detention review were improperly obtained or lacked proper authentication, while the opposing party contended that the procedural irregularities were minor and did not affect the fairness of the proceedings. The court ruled that the defects identified were insufficient to justify reopening the case or overturning the lower court's findings on evidence admissibility.