Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding admissibility of evidence in immigration detention proceedings due to procedural defects.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the lower court's decision to exclude specific evidence in an immigration detention case. The appellant argued that the exclusion violated their right to defense, while the lower court found the evidence inadmissible due to improper collection methods. The court upheld the lower ruling, emphasizing that strict procedural compliance is mandatory in detention proceedings to protect fundamental rights.