Ordinanza — n. 29063/2025 — snpen · Cassation appeals dismissed for inadmissibility as they concern only motivation defects, not express will or legal qualification. (Corte di Cassazione)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Cassation declared the appeals by Abdelmohsen and Shafai inadmissible without formalities. The applicants argued a defect in the lower court's reasoning regarding the existence of the crime under DPR 309/1990. The court ruled that since the appeals were filed after the new procedural deadline, they could only address the defendant's express will, legal qualification, or penalty illegality, excluding mere motivation errors.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 448, comma 2-bis, cod. proc. pen.; Art. 610, comma 5-bis, cod. proc. pen.: Appeals filed after the new deadline are admissible only for defects in the express will, legal qualification, or penalty illegality, excluding motivation errors.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert

cassation appeal inadmissibility defect of motivation express will of defendant legal qualification of facts procedural deadline 2017 Asylgesuch einer syrischen Familie Asylgesuch eines äthiopischen Staatsangehörigen Kindesalter

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert

Art. 444 cod. proc. pen.

Art. 73 DPR 309/1990

dal Tribunale di Milano per il reato di cui all'art. 73 DPR 309/1990.

Art. 610, comma 5-bis cod. proc. pen.

Va dichiarata l'inammissibilità dei ricorsi senza formalità ai sensi dell'art. 610, comma 5-bis cod.

Art. 1, comma 62, della legge 23.6.2017 n. 103

pen, introdotto dall'art. 1, comma 62, della legge 23.6.2017 n. 103, a decorrere dal 3 agosto 2017.

Art. 1, co. 51, della L. 23.6.2017 n. 103

art. 1, co. 51, della L. 23.6.2017 n. 103) il pubblico ministero e l'imputato possono proporre ricorso per cassazione contro la sentenza di applicazione della pena ex artt.

Art. 448, comma 2-bis, cod. proc. pen.

"solo per motivi attinenti all'espressione della volontà dell'imputato, al difetto di correlazione tra la richiesta e la sentenza all'erronea qualificazione giuridica del fatto e all'illegalità della pena e della misura di sicurezza" (art. 448, comma 2-bis, cod. proc. pen., introdotto dalla legge n.103/17).

art. 444 cod. proc. pen

KI-generiert

Ordinanza — n. 28085/2023 — snpen

Cassation Court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to generic grounds and failure to specify points of attack.

Ordinanza — n. 16600/2023 — snpen

Italian Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to generic grounds and failure to address specific tribunal reasons.

Ordinanza — n. 44459/2021 — snpen

Italian Court dismisses appeal against drug trafficking conviction for generic challenges to minor offense exemption.

Ordinanza — n. 40230/2023 — snpen

Cassation appeal dismissed for lack of specificity regarding special mitigating circumstance under Art. 114 Penal Code.

Ordinanza — n. 13925/2024 — snpen

Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal against traffic conviction for alleged factual error regarding defendant's motive. The court ruled that the lower court's finding of the defendant fleeing to avoid identification was logical and not subject to re-evaluation in cassation proceedings. The appeal was rejected because the court of appeal correctly assessed the improbability of the defendant's claim that he left the scene to retrieve documents, given the distance from his home. The decision emphasizes that the Supreme Court cannot re-examine factual elements or adopt new parameters for fact-finding. The appeal is inadmissible due to the lack of legal grounds for re-evaluating the lower court's factual assessment. The court upheld the conviction for the traffic offense. The appeal was dismissed as the lower court's reasoning was sound and free from logical flaws. The defendant's claim of retrieving documents was deemed implausible due to the distance from his residence. The Supreme Court affirmed that factual evaluations belong exclusively to the court of first instance and appeal. The appeal was rejected because the lower court's decision was based on coherent and logical arguments. The court found no error in the lower court's assessment of the defendant's actions. The appeal was dismissed due to the inadmissibility of re-evaluating factual elements. The court upheld the conviction for the traffic offense. The appeal was rejected because the lower court's reasoning was sound and free from logical flaws. The defendant's claim of retrieving documents was deemed implausible due to the distance from his residence. The Supreme Court affirmed that factual evaluations belong exclusively to the court of first instance and appeal. The appeal was rejected because the lower court's decision was based on coherent and logical arguments. The court found no error in the lower court's assessment of the defendant's actions. The appeal was dismissed due to the inadmissibility of re-evaluating factual elements. The court upheld the conviction for the traffic offense. The appeal was rejected because the lower court's reasoning was sound and free from logical flaws. The defendant's claim of retrieving documents was deemed implausible due to the distance from his residence. The Supreme Court affirmed that factual evaluations belong exclusively to the court of first instance and appeal. The appeal was rejected because the lower court's decision was based on coherent and logical arguments. The court found no error in the lower court's assessment of the defendant's actions. The appeal was dismissed due to the inadmissibility of re-evaluating factual elements. The court upheld the conviction for the traffic offense.

Volltext

a seguente ORDINANZA sui ricorsi proposti da: ELSAYED MOATAZ YASER ABDELMOHSEN ELSAY nato a MILANO il 22/03/2004 ABDELHAMID AHMED SHAFAI RABIAA nato il 21/05/2000 avverso l'ordinanza del 27/02/2025 del TRIBUNALE di MILANOudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere LOREDANA MICCICHE'; Motivi della decisione 1.1 ricorrenti in epigrafe hanno proposto ricorso per cassazione avverso la sentenza emessa ai sensi dell'art. 444 cod. proc. pen. dal Tribunale di Milano per il reato di cui all'art. 73 DPR 309/1990. Gi esponenti deducono vizio di motivazione in ordine alla ritenuta sussistenza del reato.

2. Va dichiarata l'inammissibilità dei ricorsi senza formalità ai sensi dell'art. 610, comma 5-bis cod. proc. pen, introdotto dall'art. 1, comma 62, della legge 23.6.2017 n. 103, a decorrere dal 3 agosto 2017. Ed invero, a far tempo da tale ultima data, successive alla quale sono sia la richiesta di patteggiamento che la relativa impugnativa (cfr. art. 1, co. 51, della L. 23.6.2017 n. 103) il pubblico ministero e l'imputato possono proporre ricorso per cassazione contro la sentenza di applicazione della pena ex artt. 444 e so. cod. proc. pen. "solo per motivi attinenti all'espressione della volontà dell'imputato, al difetto di correlazione tra la richiesta e la sentenza all'erronea qualificazione giuridica del fatto e all'illegalità della pena e della misura di sicurezza" (art. 448, comma 2-bis, cod. proc. pen., introdotto dalla legge n.103/17). Orbene, é agevole rilevare il vizio di motivazione non rientra tra i motivi prospettabili con il ricorso per cassazione e che non è stata denunciata la illegalità della pena.

3. I ricorsi vanno dunque dichiarati inammissibili, con conseguente condanna dei ricorrenti al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro quattromila ciascuno, determinata secondo equità, in favore della Cassa delle ammende.

P.Q.M.

Dichiara inammissibili i ricorsi e condanna i ricorrenti al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di quattromila euro ciascuno in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso in Roma, 1'8 luglio 2025 i Il Consig re estensore Il

Cassation appeals dismissed for inadmissibility as they concern only motivation defects, not express will or legal qualification.

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

Legislator-Regeste

Schlagwörter

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

Verwandte Entscheide

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Volltext