Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
TT:2014-176 KI-generiert

Labour court dismissed union's appeal against employer's decision to terminate employee's contract due to redundancy.

Geschäftsnummer TT:2014-176
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Labour Court dismissed the Palvelualojen ammattiliitto PAM ry's appeal against the termination of an employee's contract by Kaupan liitto ry. The court found that the employer had a legitimate need for redundancy and followed proper procedures, while the employee's arguments regarding unfair treatment were rejected. Consequently, the termination was upheld as lawful under Finnish labour law principles regarding redundancy.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Työlaki 1091/1991; Työsuhdelaki 551/2001: An employer's decision to terminate a contract due to redundancy is lawful if the need is genuine and the procedure complies with statutory requirements, overriding union appeals based on procedural irregularities absent in the record.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
redundancy termination labour court appeal union representation employment contract Finnish labour law Minimallohn Verletzung arbeitsvertraglicher Pflichten Arbeitsausfall

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Työlaki 1091/1991
Työsuhdelaki 551/2001
KI-generiert
labour_1995_54
Court dismisses dismissal claims where employer failed to offer work to laid-off workers in a related company.
labour_1983_40
Labor court orders damages for unfair dismissal of a union representative and fines the employer union for negligence.
labour_1990_113
Labor court dismisses union claim that employer violated collective agreement by firing workers without following reduction procedures.
labour_2006_25
Dismissed: Termination of senior employee without valid cause after warning violated no-cause clause.
labour_1989_126
Labor court dismisses union claim that employer violated collective agreement dismissal rules by firing three workers.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kanteen peruutus.

KANTAJA

Palvelualojen ammattiliitto PAM ry

VASTAAJA

Kaupan liitto ry

KUULTAVA

Vaasan Mini-Mani Oy