Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1548/2018 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove persecution based on protected grounds.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1548/2018
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the applicant's request for continued residence due to persecution. The applicant alleged threats based on sexual orientation, but the court found no credible evidence of state-sponsored persecution or specific threats from identifiable actors. Consequently, the statutory requirements for granting a continuation of residence permit were not met.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

OK 25 a luku 11 §; RL 25 luku 7 a §: An asylum seeker must substantiate claims of persecution with credible evidence linking the threat to a protected ground and specific persecutors; mere general fear without concrete proof of state involvement or targeted harassment does not satisfy the statutory criteria for continued residence.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
asylum continuation residence persecution evidence standard protected grounds requirement state involvement proof Supreme Court asylum ungenügend begründete Rüge Begriff des Mobbings Straftaten gegen den Geheimbereich

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
OK 25 a luku 11 §
RL 25 luku 7 a §
KI-generiert
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__2090
Court convicted defendant of insulting and abusive writing in a court document under Finnish Penal Code.
kko-other_2025_115
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding refusal of continued detention order based on serious crime grounds.
kko-other_1995_1917
Supreme Court dismissed appeal where new facts emerged only in respondent's answer to lower court ruling.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2020:30
Supreme Court dismisses harassment charge where insult and harassment charges merge under secondary clause rules.
kko-precedent_2012_30
Supreme Court quashes contempt fine due to failure to notify defendant of hearing opportunity via regular mail.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys jatkokäsittelyluvan myöntämisen edellytyksistä vainoamista koskevassa asiassa.

OK 25 a luku 11 §

RL 25 luku 7 a §