Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1055/2018 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows delayed interest from three months after judgment under KML 203 and KorkoL 4.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1055/2018
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court allowed the claim for delayed interest, ruling that it must begin three months after the judgment was issued. The lower court had initially fixed the start date at the moment of the judgment, but the Supreme Court clarified the procedural timeline. This decision ensures consistent application of the interest calculation period mandated by the relevant statutes.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

KML 203 § 1 mom; KML 203 § 3 mom; KorkoL 4 § 1 mom: Delayed interest on a claim for damages begins to accrue three months after the judgment is pronounced.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
delayed interest judgment date three month period damages claim statutory interest Wiederherstellung der versäumten Frist ausstehende Lizenzgebühren Verzugskosten

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KML 203 § 1 mom
KML 203 § 3 mom
KorkoL 4 § 1 mom
KI-generiert
kko-other_1997_4330
Supreme Court dismissed late damages claim under Employment Contracts Act and set interest start date.
appeal_1986_helsinki__2524
Court awarded 16% interest on 1982 damages claims as they were not delayed under the Interest Act.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2026:37
Supreme Court orders state to pay interest on legal costs from one month after judgment despite delayed payment due to pending guilt determination.
kko-other_1997_4328
Supreme Court held that employer's damages claim for early termination under Employment Act is not premature post-judgment.
kko-precedent_2012_19
Supreme Court rules no interest on collection costs before debtor receives specific interest rate details.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Maaoikeus oli pysyttänyt toimituksessa rasitteen perustamisesta määrätyn korvauksen ja määrännyt viivästyskoron alkamisajankohdaksi kolme kuukautta tuomion antamisesta. Kysymys siitä, mistä ajankohdasta alkaen viivästyskorko oli määrättävä suoritettavaksi.

KML 203 § 1 mom

KML 203 § 3 mom

KorkoL 4 § 1 mom