Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1683/2016 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows appeal against lower court dismissal due to missing objection filing record.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1683/2016
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the District Court's decision to dismiss the prosecution's complaint. The prosecution had timely filed an objection to the District Court's judgment, but the District Court failed to record this objection in its file, causing the Court of Appeal to dismiss the appeal without examination. The Supreme Court ruled that the procedural defect necessitated remanding the case for proper handling of the objection.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 33 of the Criminal Procedure Act; Section 34 of the Criminal Procedure Act: When a lower court fails to record a timely objection to its judgment, the appellate court must not dismiss the appeal without examination and the case must be remanded for correction of the procedural defect.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
criminal procedure objection to judgment procedural defect appellate review remand for correction record keeping timely objection Justizirrtum

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 33 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Section 34 of the Criminal Procedure Act
KI-generiert
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:5
Supreme Court allows appeal review of late dissatisfaction notice approval as procedural issue, not final judgment.
kko-precedent_2009_38
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; judge not liable for jurisdictional error due to ambiguous coercive procedure rules.
kko-precedent_2011_30
Supreme Court remands appeal to High Court for retrial due to procedural error excluding defendant despite lawyer's presence.
kko-other_2009_2319
Supreme Court allows appeal when lower court wrongly issues default judgment during preparation phase.
kko-other_2012_823
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where court president lacked authority to preside over the case.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Asianomistaja oli ilmoittanut määräajassa tyytymättömyyttä käräjäoikeuden tuomioon. Käräjäoikeuden tuomiosta oli käräjäoikeudessa tapahtuneen virheen johdosta puuttunut merkintä tyytymättömyyden ilmoituksesta, minkä vuoksi hovioikeus oli jättänyt asianomistajan valituksen tutkimatta. Kysymys valituksen tutkimisesta.