Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding attempted serious drug offense where police seized drugs before defendant's discovery.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the defendant's appeal concerning a charge of attempted serious drug offense. The defendant claimed he attempted to acquire approximately 8 kilograms of amphetamine after learning of a cache in 2013, while police had already seized the drugs in 2012. The court ruled that the defendant's actions did not constitute the crime because the drugs were no longer available for him to acquire at the time of his alleged attempt.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertRL 50 luku 1 §; RL 50 luku 2 §: An attempt to commit a crime requires the execution of acts directed toward the consummation of the offense; if the object of the crime is already seized by authorities before the accused can act, the attempt is not established.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
A oli yrittänyt hankkia noin 8 kilogrammaa amfetamiinia. A oli 11.1.2013 saanut tiedon maastossa sijaitsevasta kätköstä, jossa olleen amfetamiinin poliisi oli 22.9.2012 takavarikoinut. Kysymys siitä, oliko A menettelyllään syyllistynyt törkeään huumausainerikokseen. Ks. KKO:2014:59
RL 5 luku 1 § 2 mom
RL 50 luku 1 §
RL 50 luku 2 §