KKO 478/2012
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses work injury claim where ankle pain stems from prior injury, not the accident.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the claimant's request for compensation regarding prolonged ankle and heel pain. The court found that the heel area had been compressed prior to the accident, causing the injury, rather than the work accident itself. Consequently, the causal link between the work injury and the subsequent pain was not established.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertWork Injury Act s. 1; Work Injury Act s. 2: An injury is not considered a work injury if it is caused by a pre-existing condition or prior injury rather than the accident itself.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
work injury compensation
causal link assessment
pre-existing condition
heel compression injury
Supreme Court of Finland
work injury Act
medical causation
Arbeitsphysiologie
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertWork Injury Act s. 1
Work Injury Act s. 2
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-precedent_2007_60
Supreme Court allows compensation for chronic neck pain aggravated by accident despite pre-existing degeneration.
kko-other_1996_674
Workplace injury claim dismissed because employee's fall was caused by his own negligence, not employer fault.
kko-other_2000_1871
Supreme Court dismissed claim for additional shoulder injuries not directly caused by the fall.
kko-other_2011_629
Work injury claim dismissed because shoulder pain occurred after the accident date and lacks causal link.
kko-precedent_2010_65
Supreme Court rules CRPS syndrome following work injury is compensable despite endoscopy complications.
Volltext
Kysymys kantapään ja nilkan pitkittyneiden vaivojen syy-yhteydestä työtapaturmaan, jossa kantapään alue oli jäänyt puristuksiin.