Supreme Court dismisses claim that shoulder rotator cuff and biceps tendon rupture caused a traffic accident.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim that the rupture of the shoulder rotator cuff and biceps tendon was causally linked to a traffic accident. The plaintiff argued the injury occurred during the accident, while the defense contended the injury was pre-existing or unrelated. The court ruled that the medical evidence failed to establish a direct causal connection between the specific injuries and the accident events.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLain 157/1986 1 luku 100 a luku 100 b: The court held that a traffic accident compensation claim is only valid if there is a direct causal link between the accident and the specific injury sustained.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Kysymys siitä, olivatko olkapään kiertäjäkalvosimen ja hauislihaksen pitkän pään jänteen repeämät syy-yhteydessä tapaturmaan.