Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 882/2008 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding attempted burglary charges when facts do not meet threshold for serious theft.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 882/2008
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal concerning charges of attempted serious theft for entering occupied dwellings. The prosecution alleged the defendant entered homes with intent to steal, while the defense argued the circumstances did not constitute the aggravated offense. The court determined that the specific facts presented failed to satisfy the legal requirements for the charge of serious theft.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Laki rikosrekisteristä 1069/1999; 1069/1999 rikoslaki: The court held that entry into occupied dwellings without specific aggravating circumstances does not automatically constitute the crime of serious theft.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
attempted serious theft occupied dwellings burglary charges criminal threshold Supreme Court appeal Mietsache missbräuchliche Forderung des Vermieters anvertraute Sache

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
1069/1999 rikoslaki
KI-generiert
appeal_1983_helsinki__1202
Court convicted defendant of serious theft using a hook to bypass a lock.
kko-leave_2026_25
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding severe damage to a Bronze Age settlement caused by timber harvesting.
kko-precedent_2013_57
Attempted burglary of occupied homes insufficiently proven for aggravated theft due to lack of holistic evidence.
kko-precedent_2015_52
Supreme Court of Finland allows appeal, finding fraud serious due to high benefit amount despite mitigating circumstances.
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__889
Court dismisses theft charge for unauthorized use of a locked car taken via burglary.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli anastustarkoituksessa tunkeutunut asuttuihin asuntoihin. Kysymys siitä, oliko A syyllistynyt törkeän varkauden yrityksiin.