KKO 732/2006
KI-generiert
Supreme Court held that lower courts must organize a main hearing in robbery cases to ensure procedural fairness.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court of Finland ruled that the Court of Appeal failed in its duty to organize a main hearing in a robbery case. The prosecution argued that the lower court's summary proceedings were sufficient, but the court emphasized the need for a full trial in serious crimes. Consequently, the decision was overturned to mandate a proper main hearing to protect the defendant's rights.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertKorkein oikeus 1. luvun 10 a § ja rikoslain 10 luvun 1 §:n nojalla: Pääkäsittely on velvollinen järjestämään pääkäsittelyn raskaissa rikosasioissa, jos se on tarpeen asian oikeudenmukaisessa ratkaisemisessa.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
main hearing duty
robbery case
procedural fairness
lower court obligation
criminal procedure law
Recht auf einen Verteidiger
Säumnis des Parteivertreters
mangelnder Befangenheitsbeweis
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertSection 10a of Chapter 1 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
Section 1 of Chapter 10 of the Criminal Code
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-other_2008_2235
Supreme Court held lower court must submit case to main hearing in murder proceedings.
kko-other_2011_1746
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding lower court's duty to transfer robbery case to main hearing.
kko-other_2008_2573
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer serious assault case to main hearing upon request.
kko-other_2010_2388
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer serious theft cases to main hearing without delay.
kko-precedent_2000_62
Supreme Court allows retrial in criminal appeal when lower court misjudged witness credibility without new evidence.
Volltext
Kysymys hovioikeuden velvollisuudesta järjestää pääkäsittely ryöstöä koskevassa rikosasiassa.