KKO 400/2005
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when oral evidence credibility requires first-instance trial.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding a civil servant's violent resistance case. The lower court had to evaluate the credibility of oral testimony, necessitating a full trial at the Court of Appeal. Consequently, the Supreme Court ruled that such appeals cannot be screened out without a prior hearing.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertOK 26 luku 2 § 1 mom 1 kohta; An appeal cannot be screened out if the case's resolution depends on the credibility of oral testimony, requiring a first-instance trial.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
oral testimony credibility
screening out appeals
violent resistance case
first instance trial
Supreme Court procedure
Grundsatz in dubio pro reo
voller Beweis
Beweiswürdigung und Beweiskraft
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertOK 26 luku 2 § 1 mom 1 kohta
OK 26 luku 2 § 1 mom 1 kohta
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-other_2005_346
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding police officer's use of force during screening procedures under specific conditions.
kko-precedent_2007_10
Supreme Court quashes appeal court verdict for failing to hear victim personally in criminal trial.
kko-other_2009_2190
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer serious theft cases to main hearing for full review.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__766
Court upheld conviction for aggravated assault, rejecting reformatio in peius request despite new evidence of life-threatening injury.
kko-precedent_1995_79
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court relied on new evidence without requesting defendant's response.
Volltext
Kun asian ratkaiseminen virkamiehen väkivaltaista vastustamista koskevassa asiassa riippui suullisen todistelun uskottavuudesta ja asiassa oli siten toimitettava pääkäsittely hovioikeudessa, valitusta ei saanut seuloa.
OK 26 luku 2 § 1 mom 1 kohta