Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2037/2004 KI-generiert

Supreme Court holds employer liable for employee's injury caused by a defective railing attachment during construction work.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2037/2004
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland ruled in favor of the architect and construction manager, holding them liable for the architect's personal injury. The plaintiff fell from a terrace because the railing's attachment bolts had detached due to improper workmanship. The court determined that the employer failed to fulfill its duty of care regarding the safety of the construction site and the quality of the work performed.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Employer Liability Act; Workmen's Compensation Act: An employer is liable for personal injury to an employee if the injury was caused by the employer's fault in the execution of work or in the organization of work.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
employer liability personal injury construction defect workplace safety fault in execution duty of care improper workmanship Haftung des Architekten

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Employer Liability Act 1985
Workmen's Compensation Act 1985
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1987_23
Supreme Court dismisses claim against municipality; building inspector fulfilled duties despite floor subsidence damage.
kko-precedent_2001_2
Supreme Court dismisses municipality's liability for building subsidence when inspector relied on professional engineer's foundation report.
kko-precedent_2008_62
Supreme Court holds municipality liable for negligence in structural inspection of a collapsed agricultural hall roof.
kho-other_2014_3718
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal regarding revocation of construction site supervisor approval for non-compliance.
kho-other_2019_5192
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal permission request as no legal interest exists for the case to be heard.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys arkkitehdin, rakennesuunnittelijan, vastaavan työnjohtajan ja kaupungin rakennusvalvontaviranomaisen korvausvastuusta henkilövahingosta, kun omakotitalon rakennuttaja putosi talon terassilta sen kaiteen kiinnitysten irrottua.