KKO 1938/2004
KI-generiert
Supreme Court rules a lake within a property boundary is an enclosed lake and thus part of the real estate.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court ruled that a lake situated within the defined boundaries of a property constitutes an enclosed lake and is legally part of that real estate. The parties disputed whether the water body should be excluded from the property description based on its natural state. The court determined that the physical location within the boundary lines overrides any argument regarding the lake's natural characteristics.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertKorkein oikeus 1938/2004: Kiinteistön rajauksen mukaisesti kiinteistön alueella oleva lampi on umpilampi ja kuuluu kiinteistön osaksi; kiinteistön rajauksen mukainen sijainti määrittää vesialueen osuuden kiinteistöön.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
enclosed lake
property boundary
real estate inclusion
natural water body
land registration
Lichtverschmutzung
Liegenschaftsgrenze
Binnengewässer
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertECLI:FI:KHO:2023:108
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal, quashing permit due to insufficient survey and flawed interest comparison in floating bridge case.
admin_1989_water-superior__74
Administrative court dismissed owner's claim for official aid to replace a dam blocking navigation.
admin_1988_central-finland-county__744
Administrative court dismissed state's claim to own road area as separate property due to lack of ownership.
admin_1993_water-superior__79
Administrative court dismissed permit request for boat dock due to lack of property rights and disproportionate public harm.
kko-precedent_2017_53
Supreme Court dismisses tidal marsh acquisition claim due to minor harm compared to natural landscape preservation goals.
Volltext
Kysymys siitä, kuuluiko erään kiinteistön alueella oleva lampi kiinteistölle umpilampena.