KKO 1824/2004
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding collective agreement general binding force under TSL 17 § 1.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the general binding force of a collective agreement. The appellant argued that the agreement lacked proper authority to bind non-signatory employees, while the opposing party maintained its validity under the relevant statute. The court upheld the lower court's decision, confirming that the agreement remains binding as established by the specific legal provision.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertTSL 17 § 1; A collective agreement concluded by recognized parties acquires general binding force for all employees within the defined scope, and this force cannot be successfully challenged on procedural grounds absent statutory violation.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
collective agreement binding force
general binding effect
labor law dispute
supreme court appeal
TSL 17 section 1
Werklohnforderung
üblicher Arbeitsausfall
Lohnpolitik
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertTSL 17 § 1
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertlabour_2011_68
Labor court dismisses appeal when collective agreement covers only one-third of sector workers, failing statutory representation requirements.
labour_1987_158
Labour court orders employer to pay damages for late vacation pay and severance payments under collective agreement.
labour_2003_74
Labor court dismissed union appeal as collective agreement lacked sufficient sector-wide representation to be binding.
labour_2007_48
Labor court fines union branches for strike over overtime pay, reducing amounts based on strike duration and participants.
labour_2003_73
Labor court dismisses union appeal as collective agreement fails to represent majority of employees.
Volltext
Kysymys työehtosopimuksen yleissitovuudesta.
TSL 17 § 1 (320/1970)