Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1615/2004 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows joint residence decision by parents when one intends to move abroad with child.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1615/2004
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the appeal regarding the division of guardianship tasks. The lower court had ruled that parents must decide jointly on the child's residence if one intends to move abroad with the child. The court found the lower court's interpretation of the Guardianship Act's provisions on joint decision-making to be correct and in the child's best interest. Consequently, the decision requiring joint parental consent for international relocation was upheld.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 9 § 3 mom; The court established that parents must jointly decide on the child's place of residence when one parent intends to move abroad with the child, ensuring the child's best interests are protected through shared parental authority.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
joint guardianship decision international relocation child residence parental authority best interests of child Supreme Court of Finland Guardianship Act Aufenthaltswechsel

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 9 § 3 mom
L lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 9 § 3 mom
KI-generiert
kko-other_1996_1559
Supreme Court defines child abduction indicators under old Criminal Code Chapter 25 Section 2.
kko-precedent_2004_76
Supreme Court allows return of abducted children to US despite mother's claim of their objection.
kko-precedent_2003_126
Supreme Court holds child custody decisions based on parental agreement must be reviewed under Article 12 of the Child Custody Act.
kko-precedent_1987_82
Supreme Court rules child custody case must be heard where child factually resides, not where social board placed them.
kko-precedent_1995_110
Supreme Court dismisses request to return children to Switzerland, ruling the mother's move was not wrongful retention under Hague Convention.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys yhteishuoltajien tehtävien jakoa koskevasta määräyksestä, jonka mukaan vanhemmat päättävät yhdessä lasten asuinpaikasta siinä tapauksessa, että se vanhemmista, jonka luona lapset asuvat, aikoo muuttaa lasten kanssa ulkomaille.

L lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 9 § 3 mom