Court held that changing land from crown to tax land does not satisfy the requirement for temporary use under the 1930 Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the validity of a temporary use right granted under the 1930 Act. The applicant argued that the right was valid despite the land's nature changing from crown land to tax land. The court ruled that the statutory requirement for temporary use was not met because the fundamental nature of the land had been altered, rendering the original conditions inapplicable.