Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1644/2003 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses forgery charges against a TV card maker due to statute of limitations expiration.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1644/2003
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the prosecution's charges against A, who manufactured and sold satellite TV access cards containing microchips. The prosecution alleged forgery and possession of forged materials, but the defense successfully argued that the statute of limitations had expired. The court ruled that the time limits for prosecution had passed before the case could be adjudicated, resulting in the dismissal of the criminal charges.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

s. 10 of the Penal Code; s. 10 of the Penal Code: The statute of limitations for prosecution has expired, and the court must dismiss the charges.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
statute of limitations forgery charges criminal prosecution time bar Supreme Court Alter und Tod Recht auf Vergessen Wiedererwägung der Invalidenrente

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
s. 10 of the Penal Code
KI-generiert
kko-other_2003_1642
Court dismisses charges of forgery and radio law violation for creating satellite TV data storage devices.
kko-precedent_2003_58
Supreme Court dismisses forgery charge because decryption tools are not legally significant evidence under the Penal Code.
kko-other_2003_1643
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding possession of satellite TV decryption data used for illegal viewing.
appeal_1980_kouvola__825
Court allows lighter sentence for forgery due to minor financial gain and defendant's role.
admin_1987_turku-and-pori-county__392
Administrative court dismissed appeal as audit office's access to legal aid files is a direct task under public access law.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli valmistanut älykortteja tallentamalla piirilevylle kiinnitettyyn mikropiiriin X Oy:n välittämien maksullisten ja suojattujen satelliittitelevisiolähetysten katselemiseen tarvittavat tiedot. A oli myös myynyt sanottuja kortteja ja niiden rakennussarjoja. Kysymys siitä, oliko A syyllistynyt väärennysrikokseen ja väärennysaineiston hallussapitoon. Kysymys myös syyteoikeuden vanhentumisesta.