Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 318/2002 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding driving under influence after taking medication post-start of journey.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 318/2002
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. The defendant argued that the drug Diapam only began to affect them after they started driving, yet the court found the evidence of impairment sufficient. Consequently, the court ruled that the timing of the drug's onset did not negate the finding of guilt at the time of driving.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Laki rattijuopumuksesta (1093/1999); 1093/1999, 1 §: Driving under the influence is established if impairment exists at the time of driving, regardless of whether the substance was taken before or after the journey commenced.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
driving under influence drug impairment timing post-start intoxication Supreme Court appeal Diapam medication medizinische Gründe Betäubungsmittelabhängigkeit ärztlicher Bericht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
1093/1999, 1 §
KI-generiert
kko-other_1996_1549
Supreme Court held that driving while intoxicated by alcohol and another drug proves knowledge of the latter's effects.
market_2023_608
Market Court dismisses appeal against FIC decision that domain was registered in bad faith for legal services.
kko-precedent_2009_73
Supreme Court allows separate drug use charge when driving under influence, rejecting prior case precedent.
kko-precedent_1996_107
Supreme Court allows traffic offense charge against driver who failed to yield despite other party's violation.
appeal_1986_helsinki__72
Defendant acquitted of dangerous driving due to sudden insulin shock-induced unconsciousness during the offense.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Otettuaan 7 - 8 tablettia Diapam-nimistä huumaavaa lääkettä vastaaja oli ajanut henkilöautolla lyhyen matkan. Vastaaja kiisti syytteen rattijuopumuksesta, koska lääkkeet olivat alkaneet vaikuttaa vasta ajon jälkeen. Kysymys näytön arvioinnista.