Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1567/2002 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding failure to examine payment plan request and procedural errors in lower courts.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1567/2002
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the decision to reject the request for a payment plan. The lower courts failed to properly examine the request and made procedural errors in their handling of the case. Consequently, the Supreme Court found no merit in the appellant's claims regarding the validity of the lower courts' actions.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Käräjäoikeuslaki 1093/1941; Korkein oikeuslaki 391/1934: The Supreme Court held that a lower court's failure to examine a request for a payment plan constitutes a procedural error, but such an error does not automatically invalidate the decision if the request was ultimately rejected on substantive grounds.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
payment plan request procedural error lower court failure supreme court appeal administrative procedure Rückerstattungspflicht finanzielle Notlage Barauszahlung der Versicherungsleistung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Käräjäoikeuslaki 1093/1941
Korkein oikeuslaki 391/1934
KI-generiert
kko-other_2002_2080
Supreme Court allows new debt arrangement for previous debtors whose payment plans were ordered to cease.
kko-other_2002_1566
Supreme Court dismissed creditor's claim for payment order cessation as it lacked unreasonably delayed grounds.
kko-precedent_1997_109
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where creditor fails to raise debt restructuring objections in lower court.
kko-precedent_1997_18
Supreme Court allows debt restructuring to remain effective while suspending the court's ruling on the payment plan.
kko-other_2007_97
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding debt restructuring payment scheme changes without unjustified delay after notice.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Velkoja oli hakenut maksuohjelman määräämistä raukeamaan. Kysymys siitä, oliko käräjäoikeus jättänyt hakemuksen tutkimatta virheellisin perustein ja oliko hovioikeus palauttaessaan jutun käräjäoikeuteen menetellyt virheellisesti lausumalla hakemuksen hyväksymisen edellytyksistä.