Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1105/2002 KI-generiert

Supreme Court held that instruments used by a composer in their work are not personal security and must be included in debt restructuring.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1105/2002
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court ruled that musical instruments used by a composer in their professional work constitute their personal security and must be excluded from debt restructuring proceedings. The debtor argued for a shorter repayment plan, but the court found no grounds to reduce the standard five-year term. Consequently, the court determined that the instruments are essential for the debtor's livelihood and cannot be seized for ordinary debts.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

VJL 5 § 2 mom; VJL 30 § 2 mom: Instruments used by a professional artist in their work are considered personal security and must be excluded from debt restructuring; the standard repayment period cannot be shortened without specific statutory grounds.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
personal security debt restructuring professional instruments repayment period composer livelihood VJL 5 VJL 30 Anspruch auf Mäklerlohn

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
VJL 5 § 2 mom
VJL 30 § 2 mom
KI-generiert
kko-other_1998_3526
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding termination of payment plan under Finnish Debt Restructuring Act Section 42.
kko-precedent_2001_21
Supreme Court allows debt arrangement due to inability to repay despite insolvency caused by reckless business behavior.
kko-other_2001_2190
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; ordinary debt repayment plan duration reduced below five years due to changed circumstances.
kko-precedent_2005_106
Supreme Court holds that long time since debt accumulation weighs heavily in debt arrangement duration assessment under Finnish law.
kko-precedent_2005_8
Supreme Court dismisses creditor's request to terminate payment plan as debtor fulfilled official notification duties.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, kuuluivatko säveltäjän työssään käyttämät soittimet hänen perusturvaansa ja tuliko ne sillä perusteella jättää käyttämättä velkojen suoritukseksi hänen velkajärjestelyssään. Lisäksi kysymys siitä, oliko edellytyksiä määrätä tavallisten velkojen maksuohjelman kesto viittä vuotta lyhyemmäksi.

VJL 5 § 2 mom

VJL 30 § 2 mom