Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2529/2001 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows retrial of murder charge due to new evidence challenging original conviction.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2529/2001
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland ordered the case to be retried after new evidence emerged suggesting the defendant did not commit the murder. The original conviction for murder was based on evidence that was subsequently challenged by fresh findings. Consequently, the case was remanded to the district court for a new examination of the facts.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

s. 24 of the Criminal Procedure Act; A new investigation revealing facts that contradict the original conviction necessitates a retrial to ensure a fair trial and correct potential judicial error.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
new evidence retrial order murder conviction criminal procedure judicial error Supreme Court remand for retrial Wiedererwägung durch den Versicherer

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
s. 24 of the Criminal Procedure Act
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2013_39
Supreme Court grants retrial permission for new evidence challenging lower court's evidence assessment in assault case.
kko-precedent_1996_133
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; remand for hearing absent owner was improper when only defendant sought review.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2018:54
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, remands case for retrial due to failure to hear victim in criminal trial.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2020:40
Supreme Court reversed appeal court's remittal order, allowing case to continue in appeal court despite flawed evidence reasoning.
kko-other_2005_2371
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding police screening procedure for suspected assault cases under specific statutory requirements.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli tuomittu rangaistukseen pahoinpitelystä. Hovioikeuden tuomion jälkeen tullut uusi selvitys antoi aiheen saattaa uudelleen tutkittavaksi, oliko A tehnyt hänen syykseen luetun rikoksen. Asia palautettiin käräjäoikeuteen uudelleen käsiteltäväksi.