KKO 1833/2001
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses preclusion objection when both criminal and civil claims are before the court of appeal.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the defendant's objection to the preclusion of the appeal court proceedings. The lower court had accepted both a criminal penalty claim and a civil damages claim against the same defendant. The court ruled that since both claims concern the same factual dispute, the defendant cannot demand separate proceedings by invoking preclusion.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLaki rikosasioista 379/1996; Laki vakuutussuostumuksista 1000/1996: When both criminal and civil claims arise from the same facts, a party cannot invoke preclusion to separate the proceedings before the court of appeal.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
preclusion objection
criminal and civil claims
same factual dispute
court of appeal
procedural consolidation
Vortrittsverletzung
vorschriftswidriges Überholen
Verschlimmerung eines Vorzustands
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertLaki rikosasioista 379/1996
Laki vakuutussuostumuksista 1000/1996
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-other_2002_2150
Supreme Court held lower court must provide compensation in main proceedings when damages are contested.
kko-other_2005_544
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding severe assault case where screening procedure requirements were not met.
kko-precedent_2003_108
Supreme Court held defendant liable for costs despite acquittal due to post-trial lighter law application.
kko-other_2006_325
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding police screening requirements for assault cases under specific procedural rules.
kko-other_2008_65
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding High Court's duty to transfer serious theft cases to main court.
Volltext
Kysymys prekluusiosta hovioikeudessa, kun hovioikeuden tutkittavaksi oli saatettu sekä rangaistus- että vahingonkorvausvaatimus.