Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1723/2001 KI-generiert

Work accident claim denied when pre-existing shoulder condition was the primary cause of injury.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1723/2001
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the claim for work accident compensation regarding the plaintiff's shoulder injuries. The plaintiff suffered fractures and soft tissue damage while rappelling, but medical evidence showed a pre-existing rotator cuff tear that significantly contributed to the injury. The court ruled that because the pre-existing condition was the dominant factor in the damage, the statutory requirement for a work-related accident was not met.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Accident Act 1982; Work Accident Compensation Act 1982: Compensation is denied when a pre-existing medical condition is the primary cause of the injury sustained during work activities.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
work accident compensation pre-existing condition dominant cause rotator cuff tear accident liability psychisches Trauma Unfallfolgen Schleudertrauma

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Accident Act 1982
Work Accident Compensation Act 1982
KI-generiert
kko-other_1998_569
Work accident claim dismissed because injury occurred during leisure time, not work duties.
kko-precedent_2007_60
Supreme Court allows compensation for chronic neck pain aggravated by accident despite pre-existing degeneration.
kko-other_2011_2942
Supreme Court dismisses claim that shoulder rotator cuff and biceps tendon rupture caused a traffic accident.
kko-other_2000_1871
Supreme Court dismissed claim for additional shoulder injuries not directly caused by the fall.
insurance_1980_3246-1980
Insurance court dismissed claim for additional compensation due to pre-existing muscle strain aggravating the tear.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli pudonnut köysitikkailta saaden olkapään sijoiltaanmenon sekä olkaluun ja lapaluun nivelpinnan reunan murtumat ja kiertäjäkalvosimen repeämän. A:lla oli ollut olkapäässä vaivoja jo ennen tapaturmaa, ja tutkimuslöydökset olivat tuolloin viitanneet kiertäjäkalvosimen rappeumaan. Kysymys oikeudesta tapaturmavakuutuslain mukaiseen korvaukseen olkapäävaivoista.