Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1654/2001 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows conviction of sole shareholder for accounting offense despite lack of formal board position.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1654/2001
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the conviction of a sole shareholder for the crime of accounting offense. Although the defendant held no formal position on the company's board, the court found he exercised actual control over the company's affairs. The decision establishes that formal titles do not exempt individuals from criminal liability when they possess de facto decision-making power.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 1 of the Act on the Crime of Accounting Offense; Section 1 of the Act on the Crime of Accounting Offense: A person who exercises actual control over a company's affairs, regardless of formal board membership, may be held criminally liable for accounting offenses committed by the company.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
accounting offense sole shareholder actual control criminal liability formal position corporate governance Supreme Court fehlende Aktivlegitimation des Aktionärs

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 1 of the Act on the Crime of Accounting Offense
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2001_85
Supreme Court dismisses state compensation claim when partial acquittal occurs alongside partial conviction on same charge.
kko-other_2020_982
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; signing documents to hide fraud constitutes aiding in serious accounting offense.
kko-precedent_2001_86
Supreme Court dismisses charge against de facto manager lacking formal role or shareholding for bookkeeping crime.
kko-precedent_2015_88
Supreme Court allows conviction for gross fraud and bookkeeping crime but dismisses business ban due to lack of necessity.
kko-precedent_2006_63
Court distinguishes forgery from false evidence when a document is used as proof in administrative proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, voiko osakeyhtiön koko osakekannan omistanut ja yhtiössä tosiasiallista määräysvaltaa käyttänyt henkilö, jolla ei ollut muodollista asemaa yhtiön hallinnossa, syyllistyä kirjanpitorikokseen tekijänä.