Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 680/2000 KI-generiert

Spousal compensation claim for exclusive use of joint property after divorce dismissed due to lack of fault.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 680/2000
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the claim for compensation arising from the exclusive use of a jointly owned residence by one spouse after divorce. The plaintiff argued that the remaining spouse's sole occupancy constituted a breach of duty, while the defendant contended that such usage was a normal consequence of the divorce without fault. The court ruled that no legal obligation existed to compensate for the mere fact of exclusive possession absent specific fault or contractual breach.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 10 of the Marriage Act; Section 10 of the Property Act: A spouse cannot be compelled to pay compensation for the exclusive use of a jointly owned residence after divorce unless specific fault or contractual breach is proven.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
divorce compensation joint property division exclusive residence use spousal fault property law Finland vermögensrechtliche Angelegenheit Minderwert des verbleibenden Teils ausschliessliches Recht im Miteigentum

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 10 of the Marriage Act
Section 10 of the Property Act
KI-generiert
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:35
Supreme Court allows eviction of cohabitant from property where sole owner has mortgage and no legal right to stay.
kko-precedent_1995_3
Supreme Court allows partial compensation for improvements made knowingly with unclear title but denies unjust enrichment claim.
kko-precedent_2003_82
Supreme Court rules wife retains half ownership of marital home buildings despite husband's bankruptcy and sole land title.
kko-precedent_1996_54
Supreme Court dismisses spousal housing usage compensation claim under Marriage Act Section 24 as unreasonable.
kko-precedent_1995_98
Divorce decree does not prevent court from issuing order to end cohabitation under Marriage Act s. 24(1).

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, voitiinko puolisoiden määräosin omistamaan yhteiseen asuinkiinteistöön avioeron jälkeen asumaan jäänyt puoliso velvoittaa suorittamaan asunnosta pois muuttaneelle puolisolle korvausta siitä, että asumaan jäänyt puoliso käytti yksin yhteistä omaisuutta.