Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2682/2000 KI-generiert

Supreme Court held that a telecopied appeal filed on time and a signed copy sent post is a valid appeal.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2682/2000
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, ruling that the procedural requirement for timely filing was met. The appellant submitted the appeal document via telecopy within the deadline, while a signed hard copy was mailed shortly after the deadline expired. The court determined that the timely telecopied submission satisfied the statutory filing requirement, rendering the subsequent mailing of the signed version irrelevant to the timeliness of the appeal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

s. 100 vakuutuslain (1906); An appeal filed within the statutory period via telecopy constitutes a valid submission, and the subsequent mailing of a signed copy does not invalidate the timely filing.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
insurance appeal timeliness telecopy filing validity postmarked signature effect statutory deadline compliance procedural filing rules Sicherungsexemplar Rechtzeitigkeit der Postaufgabe Weitersenderecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
s. 100 vakuutuslain (1906)
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1992_64
Finnish Supreme Court allows appeal application submitted by fax within deadline despite missing original signature until after deadline.
insurance_1994_6154-1994
Insurance Court dismissed late appeal filed via fax after deadline expired due to technical transmission delay.
kko-precedent_1997_78
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where telecopy appeal started after office hours, requiring full document arrival before deadline.
admin_1992_uusimaa-county__28
Administrative court dismissed appeal filed after deadline but accepted due to fax submission principles.
admin_2014_vaasa__141
Administrative court dismissed appeal due to late filing after office hours despite email notification.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Valituskirjelmä oli saapunut vakuutusyhtiöön telekopiona määräajassa ja allekirjoitettu kappale valituskirjelmästä postitse määräajan päättymisen jälkeen. Kysymys siitä, oliko valitus saapunut ajoissa tapaturmavakuutusasiassa.