KKO 1722/2000
KI-generiert
Supreme Court rules that a torn rotator cuff is not a work accident but a personal injury.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the claim that a torn rotator cuff constituted a work-related accident. The insured argued the injury occurred during work, while the employer contended it was a personal injury unrelated to employment duties. The court determined that the specific nature of the injury did not arise from the work environment or tasks, thus rejecting the work accident classification.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertWork Accident Act; Personal Injury Act: A torn rotator cuff sustained during work activities is classified as a personal injury rather than a work accident if the injury did not result from the work environment or tasks.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
work accident classification
rotator cuff injury
personal injury distinction
workplace accident liability
insurance claim rejection
medizinische Überprüfung
fachärztliche Neubeurteilung
gewerbesteuerliche Hinzurechnung
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertWork Accident Act
Personal Injury Act
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-other_2011_2942
Supreme Court dismisses claim that shoulder rotator cuff and biceps tendon rupture caused a traffic accident.
kko-other_2006_2143
Supreme Court dismissed claim for work accident compensation for tendon rupture due to lack of causation between work and injury.
kko-other_1998_569
Work accident claim dismissed because injury occurred during leisure time, not work duties.
insurance_1982_7755-1981
Work injury claim dismissed as 20% of shoulder tear was pre-existing age-related degeneration.
kko-other_2007_483
Supreme Court dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove accidental tear of filter membrane caused by trauma.
Volltext
Kysymys siitä, onko vakuutetulla todettua oikean olkapään kiertäjäkalvosimen repeämää pidettävä tapaturman seurauksena.