Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 107/2000 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses claim for accident compensation when injury occurs during mandatory work practice under the Employment Act.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 107/2000
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's claim for accident compensation regarding an injury sustained during mandatory work practice. The applicant argued that the injury should be covered under the Work Accident Compensation Act, while the opposing party contended that the specific provisions of the Employment Act excluded such coverage for this context. The court ruled that the statutory framework for work practice under the Employment Act precludes the application of the Work Accident Compensation Act in this scenario.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Tapaturmakorvauslaki 1 § 1 kohta; Työeläkelaki 1 § 1 kohta: Injuries sustained during mandatory work practice governed by the Employment Act are excluded from compensation under the Work Accident Compensation Act.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
work practice injury employment act provisions accident compensation exclusion mandatory training coverage supreme court ruling Massnahme beruflicher Art Wiedereinschulung Zugang zum Beruf

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Tapaturmakorvauslaki 1 § 1 kohta
Työeläkelaki 1 § 1 kohta
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1989_52
Supreme Court dismisses claim that a knife cut during a lunch break in a social room was a work accident. The court rules the injury did not occur in work-related circumstances. The claim is rejected because the location and timing were not part of the work environment. The decision clarifies the strict boundaries of work accident coverage. This case establishes that breaks in designated social areas are not work-related. The ruling emphasizes the need for direct work connection for coverage. The court maintains the lower court's decision on the matter.
insurance_1978_6061-1977
Insurance court dismissed claim for work injury compensation when injury occurred during employer-organized sports training.
insurance_1977_6782-1976
Workplace injury during lunch break deemed work-related accident under Finnish Insurance Court jurisdiction.
kko-precedent_2000_93
Supreme Court holds injury during free time after event program ended is not a work accident under Act 4 § 1.
insurance_1998_3849-1997
Temporary work without payment does not constitute a TVL contract; meal allowance alone is insufficient compensation.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli vammautunut työllisyysasetuksen mukaisessa työharjoittelussa. Kysymys hänen oikeudestaan tapaturmakorvaukseen.

TapVakL 1 § 1 mom