Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2811/1998 KI-generiert

Court held that a third-party buyer of business assets is liable for restitution under bankruptcy law when funds were diverted to a third party.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2811/1998
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court ruled that company B was liable for restitution to company A's bankruptcy estate alongside the original debtor. Although B had purchased the business assets from A after A's insolvency, the court found that B had received funds diverted by a third party from A's creditors. Consequently, the court determined B must return the assets to the bankruptcy estate to satisfy A's creditors.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Laki 1093/1991 20 §; A third-party purchaser of business assets is liable for restitution to the bankruptcy estate if the assets were acquired using funds improperly diverted from the original debtor's creditors.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
bankruptcy restitution third party liability business asset transfer insolvency law creditor rights vermögensrechtliche Angelegenheit Rückabtretung Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Laki 1093/1991 20 §
KI-generiert
kko-other_1999_262
Supreme Court rules that a bankruptcy trustee must return excess payments made to a creditor in a resale case.
kko-precedent_1988_111
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when bankruptcy administrator accepts full payment from debtor, preventing funds from joining the bankruptcy estate.
kko-precedent_1989_27
Supreme Court allows debt transfer as substitute performance under Bankruptcy Act 46 § d.
kko-other_2013_694
Supreme Court dismissed creditor's appeal regarding right to drive seized funds and documents.
kko-precedent_1999_21
Supreme Court allows full recovery of debt from creditor under bankruptcy recovery law despite creditor's lack of knowledge of debtor's insolvency.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Yhtiö A oli myynyt läheisyhtiölleen B:lle liikeomaisuutensa. Saamallaan kauppahinnalla A oli maksanut velkojaan läheisyhtiölleen kommandiittiyhtiö C:lle, jonka vastuunalainen yhtiömies oli välittömästi siirtänyt rahat C:n tililtä B:n pankkitilille. B oli A:n jouduttua konkurssiin runsaan vuoden kuluttua myynyt koko liikeomaisuutensa läheisyhtiölleen D:lle.

Kysymys siitä, oliko D takaisinsaannista konkurssipesään annetun lain 20 §:n nojalla palautusvelvollisen B:n ohella vastuussa varojen palauttamisesta A:n konkurssipesälle.