Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 28/1998 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages against investment reserve company for following erroneous accounting advice.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 28/1998
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim for damages brought by an investment reserve company and its liable partner. The company had terminated its investment reserve loan based on flawed advice received from a bookkeeping firm. The court held that the company bears the risk of following professional advice unless there was gross negligence or fraud, which was not proven.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Bookkeeping Act 1998; Commercial Code: A company acting on professional advice is not liable for damages unless the advisor acted with gross negligence or fraud.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
investment reserve loan professional advice liability commercial company damages gross negligence standard bookkeeping firm duty Misswirtschaft Mikroprudenzielle Aufgaben Veruntreuungsuntersuchung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Bookkeeping Act 1998
Commercial Code
KI-generiert
kho-precedent_2004_19
Finnish Supreme Administrative Court allows company to avoid tax on distributed profits due to negative equity.
kko-precedent_2004_134
Supreme Court allows separate VAT fraud conviction for personal income tax evasion of company funds.
admin_2012_vaasa__396
Administrative court held a purchased limited partnership not dissolved for tax purposes when an outsider continues business alone.
kho-precedent_2017_143
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed VAT assessment due to lack of statutory rules for foundation construction indirect costs calculation.
kko-precedent_2012_106
Supreme Court dismisses tax fraud charge for 2000-2003 as ne bis in idem applies to prior tax penalty decisions.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kommandiittiyhtiö oli tilitoimistolta saamansa virheellisen neuvon mukaisesti purkanut investointivarauslain mukaisen investointivarauksensa. Kysymys siitä, oliko toimenpiteestä aiheutunut yhtiölle ja sen vastuunalaiselle yhtiömiehelle vahinkoa.