Administrative court dismissed appeal against nature conservation permit decision based on procedural and substantive legal grounds.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against a nature conservation permit decision. The applicant argued that the permit violated nature conservation laws and failed to consider environmental impacts adequately. The court held that the lower administrative body correctly applied the relevant statutes and that the decision complied with procedural requirements.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLuonnonsuojelulaki 9 § 1 mom.; Luonnonsuojelulaki 24 § 1 ja 2 mom., 27 § 1 mom., 61 § 3 mom. ja 76 § 1 ja 2 mom.; Hallintolainkäyttölaki 6 § 1 mom. ja 61 §: The administrative court must review whether the permit decision adheres to statutory nature conservation obligations and procedural fairness standards.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Luonnonsuojelulaki (71/1923) 9 § 1 mom.
Luonnonsuojelulaki (1096/1996) 24 § 1 ja 2 mom., 27 § 1 mom., 61 § 3 mom. ja 76 § 1 ja 2 mom.
Hallintolainkäyttölaki 6 § 1 mom. ja 61 §
Kort referat på svenska