Court dismissed enforcement of a foreign judgment against a non-resident due to lack of jurisdiction and service issues.
Estland (EE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Tartu Regional Court dismissed the enforcement application against a non-resident defendant who was not properly served. The plaintiff argued that the foreign judgment should be recognized, but the defendant contested jurisdiction and the validity of service. The court ruled that without proper service and jurisdiction, the foreign judgment could not be enforced in Estonia.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment cannot be enforced in Estonia if the defendant was not properly served or if the Estonian court lacks jurisdiction over the defendant.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVolltext
!"
#$$"""#
%& '
(&
) * &+,-./##.0/./ &
-1
2
) & ,& 3 ) * &&&
&
,
&!, &
&
'
3
2%
!&
2
, (!
& &4&
& !! 5"0
&' + 22
& ! 0/ 0 "/61 ) * &&&
&
,
" !
&!, & 2
,
22 &
77, &&
2
&
22 & & & % " 2&
& 2&
,
22 &
& , ,
& , &
, 22 &%&
&
! "
!#
(!
& &4&
& !! 5"0
&' + 22
& !
0/ 0 "/61
) * &
& ,& 8 6 &
' .
7
" !
+1
) * &&&
22
,
2
!,
2
&
2
&' &&
&!,
,!!'
&& &&&!&
99
&&2
&
2
&!,
&
'
8""'.2
&
% &
&!, !& &
' && !' &
77, !&!&!!& &!, &
,
!,
&&% $
!! 22 & & 2
%
2
,&
&!, &
&
'
,
2
!
& # &
!,
&
& &
!2
% &
77, !& !
"".
2&
&
!,
) &
,& &
77, &&
&
,
" ! !
, &!!&
&!,
& ,
&% 2
2
, ,