Court dismisses claim for pro-rata distribution of court-deposited funds among multiple creditors.

The court dismissed the plaintiff's request to receive a pro-rata share of a sum deposited with the court by the defendant. The defendant argued that the deposited funds should be distributed equally among all creditors, while the plaintiff contended for priority based on their specific claim. The court ruled that the deposit was intended to secure the defendant's obligations and did not create a joint fund for pro-rata distribution among unsecured creditors.