Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
BS-17/2014-HJR ECLI:DK:HJR:2024:BS0000000508 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows employer's insurance company to recover overpaid difference compensation from employee's liability insurer.

Geschäftsnummer BS-17/2014-HJR
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Dänemark (DK)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision regarding the recovery of difference compensation paid by an employer's liability insurer. The appellant argued that the employee should bear the cost, but the court found the employer's insurer had a right of recourse. Consequently, the court ruled that the employer's insurance company could recover the overpaid amount from the employee's liability insurer.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Erstatningsansvarsloven § 10; Erstatningsansvarsloven § 11: The employer's liability insurer has a right of recourse against the employee's liability insurer for difference compensation paid to the employer, which the employee is ultimately liable for.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
employer liability insurance employee liability insurance difference compensation right of recourse subrogation claim workplace injury insurance recovery Rückforderung von Kurzarbeitsentschädigung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Erstatningsansvarsloven § 10
Erstatningsansvarsloven § 11
KI-generiert
BS-4362/2012-OLR
Court dismisses claim that employer's liability insurer must pay difference compensation to employee's own insurer.
BS-8/2020-GLR
Employer dismissed sick employee without notice after address change; court finds dismissal unlawful and awards damages.
BS-621/2006-OLR
Employment dispute dismissed; court upholds dismissal and wage claims against employer under equality law.
BS-5908/2024-VLR
Court upholds lower court's decision on legal costs in a workplace injury compensation case.
BS-24/2012-HJR
Consumer protection law bars buyers from claiming physical defects if they received a condition report and transfer insurance.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Højesteret stadfæster landsrettens dom i sag vedrørende spørgsmålet, om arbejdsskadeforsikringsselskabet med rette har udbetalt den forhøjede erstatning til det ansvarsforsikringsselskab, som på vegne af appellantens tidligere arbejdsgiver har udbetalt differenceerstatning efter erstatningsansvarsloven, eller om beløbet tilkommer appellanten selv

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (2 sider)

Appellant

Appellanten

Appellanten

Anonymiseret