SS-6110/2008-ROS
ECLI:DK:ROS:2024:SS0000000281
KI-generiert
Court dismisses confiscation claim for hard drive and flashlight due to lack of criminal evidence.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe court dismissed the request to confiscate a hard drive and MagLite flashlight. The prosecution argued these items were used in a crime, but the defense contested the link to criminal activity. The court ruled that insufficient evidence connected the objects to a crime, preventing confiscation.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertStraffelovens § 76; Straffelovens § 77: Confiscation of property requires proof that the item was used in a crime or constitutes proceeds of crime; mere possession without such connection precludes confiscation.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
confiscation of property
hard drive seizure
MagLite flashlight
criminal evidence standard
proceeds of crime
possession without use
Section 76 Penal Code
Einziehung von Deliktsvermögen
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertStraffelovens § 76
Straffelovens § 77
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertSS-745/2009-OLR
Court confiscates hard drive but rejects seizure of flashlight due to lack of criminal intent.
SS-715/2013-VLR
Vestre Landsret upheld the District Court's dismissal of the defense's request for police interview transcripts under the Code of Judicial Procedure.
SS-1171/2009-VLR
Seizure of items found during a search is approved by the appellate court.
SS-440/2025-OLR
High court dismisses appeal against seizure of phones where prosecution failed to prove relevance to knife charge.
SS-2093/2021-VLR
Court upheld vehicle seizure after defendant convicted of mandatory license revocation under Traffic Act.
Volltext
Spørgsmål om konfiskation af harddisk og MagLite lygte