Defense costs for independent expert review of traffic officer calculations are allowed, but material transfer for main trial is denied.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe court upheld the lower court's decision with modifications, permitting the defense to claim costs for an independent expert to review traffic officer calculations and their assumptions. However, the court refused to address the request to transfer relevant materials to the defense expert for the main criminal trial. This distinction was made because the specific request for material transfer regarding the main trial proceedings was not yet ripe for decision at this procedural stage.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertStraffelovens § 193; Straffelovens § 194: While the defense may claim costs for an independent expert to review specific calculations made by a traffic officer, the court may defer ruling on the transfer of materials to the expert for the main trial if the issue is not yet determinable.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Byrettens kendelse stadfæstes med de ændringer, at forsvareren alene kan få godtgjort udgifterne til at indhente egen sagkyndig bistand til gennemgang af bilinspektørens beregninger samt forudsætninger for beregningerne mv., og at der ikke nu tages stilling til spørgsmålet om overlevering af relevant materiale til den sagkyndige i sag om, hvorvidt den beskikkede forsvarer kan indhente sagkyndig bistand under hovedforhandling af straffesagen