BS-1272/2012-ESB
ECLI:DK:ESB:2022:BS0000002418
KI-generiert
Court dismisses tenant's claim for relocation costs after business lease termination due to lack of proof.
Dänemark (DK)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe court dismissed the tenant's claim for relocation expenses following the termination of a commercial lease. The tenant argued that the landlord failed to provide a new suitable premises, necessitating costly relocation. However, the court found no evidence that the landlord was at fault for the lack of alternative space, as the tenant did not prove the landlord's liability for the vacancy.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertSection 115 of the Lease Act; Section 116 of the Lease Act: The tenant bears the burden of proving the landlord's fault for the inability to find new premises; without such proof, claims for relocation costs are rejected.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
commercial lease termination
relocation costs claim
tenant burden of proof
landlord liability
business premises vacancy
Unterhaltsrückstände
Wiederherstellungskosten
Vorsteuerabzug und Erstattungen
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertSection 115 of the Lease Act
Section 116 of the Lease Act
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertBS-12476/2020-KOL
Court allows landlord termination but finds tenant liable for costs due to pre-existing defects.
BS-45788/2023-ARH
Contract breach claim partially allowed; court awarded damages for two weeks lost work due to lack of proof for full loss.
BS-480/2009-NYK
Tenant wins deposit refund; landlord's deduction for renovation costs rejected due to lease termination timing.
BS-42746/2019-ROS
Tenant loses deposit claim; court holds tenant liable for restoration costs exceeding deposit.
BS-355/2008-VLR
Land's court sets aside district court dismissal due to unclear legal basis in payment claim under Civil Procedure Act.
Volltext
Sagen drejer sig om fraflytningsopgøret mellem udlejer og lejer efter ophør af et erhvervslejemål