FS-4777/2008-KBH
ECLI:DK:KBH:2022:FS0000000050
KI-generiert
Court dismissed evidence preservation request for trademark infringement as no prima facie case was established.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe court dismissed the plaintiff's request to preserve evidence regarding alleged trademark infringement. The plaintiff claimed unauthorized use of their marks, but failed to provide sufficient preliminary evidence to justify the extraordinary measure. Consequently, the court ruled that the threshold for granting evidence preservation was not met.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertMarkelov, § 100; Markelov, § 101: Evidence preservation may only be granted if there is a prima facie case and a risk of evidence loss.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
trademark infringement
evidence preservation
prima facie case
preliminary evidence
unauthorized use
brand protection
court discretion
Regulierung der digitalen Märkte
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertMarkelov, § 100
Markelov, § 101
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertBS-62403/2023-SHR
Trademark and copyright infringement claims dismissed due to lack of evidence of market confusion and consumer harm.
FS-2908/2010-ROS
Court allows evidence of costs, suppliers, and customers in preservation report for trademark infringement.
BS-2325/2021-SHR
Court grants interim injunction against false bankruptcy claims and telemarketing by competitors.
BS-1237/2008-VLR
Landlord's request to submit specific court documents in lease dispute was upheld by the court.
BS-9911/2021-SHR
Court holds former director personally liable for trademark infringement via parallel imports and awards damages.
Volltext
Sag om bevissikring i relation til en række mærkevarer