Jurisdiction Over Police Detention Case Referred to Higher Cantonal Court

This provision is cited in the context of determining the jurisdiction for reviewing police actions, specifically regarding police detention, and is relevant to the court's decision on competence.

This provision is cited in the context of establishing the jurisdiction of administrative courts for reviewing administrative orders, which is a core issue in the case regarding the competence of the Verwaltungsgericht.

This constitutional provision is mentioned in relation to the right to a fair trial and the competence of courts, which underpins the jurisdictional question addressed by the court.

This provision is cited in relation to the hierarchy of courts and appeals, specifically concerning the competence of the Obergericht as the second instance in certain cases, which is directly relevant to the court's decision.

This provision pertains to the jurisdiction of the administrative courts, which is the central issue the court is deciding upon in this case.

This provision is cited concerning the competence of the Verwaltungsgericht as a second instance court, which is a key element in the court's decision to refer the case.

This provision is mentioned in the context of administrative procedures and appeals, relevant to the court's consideration of the proper legal path for the case.

This provision deals with the scope of administrative court review and competence, directly informing the court's decision on jurisdiction.

This provision concerns the competence of administrative courts and is directly applied to determine which court is appropriate for the case.

This provision likely relates to the admissibility of appeals or the competence of courts, as it is listed among the provisions considered for the jurisdictional question.

This provision is cited in the context of determining the competent appellate court, which is a central aspect of the court's ruling.

This provision is listed among those considered for the court's decision on competence, likely relating to procedural rules for appeals or jurisdiction.

This provision is cited in relation to competence and appeal routes, directly influencing the court's decision to refer the case to the Obergericht.

This provision is mentioned in the context of administrative law and potentially the jurisdiction of administrative authorities or courts, relevant to the competence question.

This provision is cited in relation to criminal procedure, and its inclusion suggests a discussion on the boundaries between administrative and criminal matters concerning police actions and detention.

This provision, related to criminal procedure, is likely cited to distinguish or connect with the administrative procedures governing police detention, impacting the jurisdictional assessment.

This provision is cited in the context of police law and powers, directly relevant to the nature of the police action being reviewed and the determination of competent jurisdiction.

This provision from police law is relevant to the court's analysis of the police action and the subsequent jurisdictional question.

This provision of police law is cited and likely pertains to specific police measures or detention, thus forming part of the basis for determining the competent court.