Deductibility of Offshore Bad Debt Provision
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe case involved a dispute over the deductibility of a bad debt provision (Delkredere-Rückstellung) for direct federal tax purposes, specifically concerning receivables from an offshore company held in a fiduciary capacity, which the tax authority disallowed as not being demonstrably business-related or justified by the actual risk of loss. The court upheld the tax authority's decision, reasoning that the general, non-specific provision for receivables from an offshore entity managed under a trust arrangement did not meet the legal requirements for deductibility as an operating expense under tax law, particularly regarding the necessity of demonstrating a concrete, current loss risk or a sound business basis for the valuation adjustment.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 58 Abs. I lit. b DBG, Art. 63 Abs. I lit. b DBG, Art. 130 Abs. II DBG, Art. 132 Abs. III DBG; Deductibility of Offshore Bad Debt Provision: The court upheld the tax authority's decision, reasoning that the general, non-specific provision for receivables from an offshore entity managed under a trust arrangement did not meet the legal requirements for deductibility as an operating expense under tax law, particularly regarding the necessity of demonstrating a concrete, current loss risk or a sound business basis for the valuation adjustment.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThis article is cited in the dispositive as the basis for dismissing the appeal concerning the tax period 2011.
This article is cited in the dispositive in connection with the dismissal of the appeal concerning the non-deductibility of provisions.
This article is cited in the dispositive in connection with the dismissal of the appeal concerning the non-deductibility of provisions.
This article is cited in the dispositive regarding the assessment of the case.
Volltext
Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: SB.2014.00083
--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)
[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=214608&W10_KEY=13317093&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)
--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · SB.2014.00083 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 29.10.2014 · Spruchkörper: · 2. Abteilung/2. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Das Bundesgericht hat eine Beschwerde in öffentlich-rechtlichen Angelegenheiten gegen diesen Entscheid am 23.11.2015 abgewiesen. · Rechtsgebiet: · Steuerrecht · Betreff: · Direkte Bundessteuer 1.1. - 31.12.2011 · Siehe SB.2014.00082. · --- · Stichworte: · DEBITOREN DELKREDERE DELKREDERE-RÜCKSTELLUNG ERFOLGSRECHNUNG ERMESSENSVERANLAGUNG GESCHÄFTSMÄSSIG UNBEGRÜNDET OFFSHORE-GESELLSCHAFT TREUHANDVERHÄLTNIS VERLUSTRISIKO VORÜBERGEHENDE WERTBERICHTIGUNG ZAHLUNGSAUSFALL · Rechtsnormen: · Art. 58 Abs. I lit. b DBG Art. 63 Abs. I lit. b DBG Art. 130 Abs. II DBG Art. 132 Abs. III DBG · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 3