Appeal Against Estimated Income Assessment Due to Inadequate Bookkeeping
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe court case concerned an appeal regarding the direct federal tax assessment for the years 2005/2006 for an individual engaged in self-employment, where the tax authority had estimated the income due to inadequate record-keeping, specifically the lack of a proper cash book and regular cash counts. The court upheld the tax authority's decision, reasoning that the appellant, operating as a sole proprietorship, failed to meet the mandatory bookkeeping requirements, which justified an estimation of income, and that the tax authority had exercised its discretionary power appropriately, thus not violating the appellant's right to be heard regarding the refusal to consider new evidence (Noven-Ausschluss) concerning the completeness of the records.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 18 DBG, Art. 18 Abs. III DBG, Art. 27 DBG, Art. 58 DBG, Art. 114 Abs. II DBG, Art. 123 Abs. II DBG; Appeal Against Estimated Income Assessment Due to Inadequate Bookkeeping: The court upheld the tax authority's decision, reasoning that the appellant, operating as a sole proprietorship, failed to meet the mandatory bookkeeping requirements, which justified an estimation of income, and that the tax authority had exercised its discretionary power appropriately, thus not violating the appellant's right to be heard regarding the refusal to consider new evidence (Noven-Ausschluss) concerning the completeness of the records.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: SB.2009.00035
--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)
Druckansicht
--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · SB.2009.00035 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 11.05.2009 · Spruchkörper: · 2. Abteilung/2. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Steuerrecht · Betreff: · Direkte Bundessteuer 2005/2006 · vgl. SB.2009.00035 · --- · Stichworte: · BEGRÜNDUNGSPFLICHT BUCHFÜHRUNG BUCHFÜHRUNGSPFLICHTIG EINZELUNTERNEHMUNG ERMESSENSEINSCHÄTZUNG KASSABUCH KASSENSTURZ NOVENAUSSCHLUSS PFLICHTGEMÄSSES ERMESSEN RECHTLICHES GEHÖR SELBSTÄNDIGE ERWERBSTÄTIGKEIT UNRICHTIGKEITSNACHWEIS · Rechtsnormen: · Art. 18 DBG Art. 18 Abs. III DBG Art. 27 DBG Art. 58 DBG Art. 114 Abs. II DBG Art. 123 Abs. II DBG Art. 125 Abs. II DBG Art. 126 Abs. I DBG Art. 126 Abs. II DBG Art. 130 Abs. II DBG Art. 131 Abs. II DBG Art. 132 Abs. III DBG Art. 140 Abs. III DBG Art. 145 Abs. II DBG § 161 GVG Art. 957 OR · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 3