Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
ZK2 2017 16 • KG SZ ZK2 2017 16 KI-generiert

Opposition Action Regarding Mortgage Assumption in Deed of Sale

Geschäftsnummer ZK2 2017 16
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

In a dispute concerning an opposition action, the court reviewed a lower court's decision that dismissed the plaintiff's claim seeking to have a mortgage lien removed from a property, which the plaintiff had acquired through a deed of sale that explicitly stipulated the assumption of the existing lien, finding that the plaintiff's subsequent unilateral attempt to reject this agreed-upon contractual burden was invalid because the sale contract was effective and the plaintiff had not demonstrated any grounds, such as a vice of consent, that would invalidate the established agreement to take over the encumbrance.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Opposition Action Regarding Mortgage Assumption in Deed of Sale: In a dispute concerning an opposition action, the court reviewed a lower court's decision that dismissed the plaintiff's claim seeking to have a mortgage lien removed from a property, which the plaintiff had acquired through a deed of sale that explicitly stipulated the assumption of the existing lien, finding that the plaintiff's subsequent unilateral attempt to reject this agreed-upon contractual burden was invalid because the sale contract was effective and the plaintiff had not demonstrated any grounds, such as a vice of consent, that would invalidate the established agreement to take over the encumbrance.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Kauf Grundpfandverschreibung Grundpfand einseitiger Vertrag Schuldübernahme Dienstbarkeitsvertrag
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 2. November 2017 \n ZK2 2017 16 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichterinnen Dr. Veronika Bürgler Trutmann und Bettina Krienbühl, Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Patrick Neidhart. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Kläger und Beschwerdeführer, gegen B.________, Beklagter und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n betreffend · \n Widerspruchsklage nach