Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
STK 2018 10 • KG SZ STK 2018 10 KI-generiert

State v. [Defendant's Name] Appeal Dismissal

Geschäftsnummer STK 2018 10
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A defendant appealed a prior conviction for theft and driving without a license, challenging the factual findings and sentencing of the lower court. The appellate court reviewed the evidence presented, including witness testimonies and documentary proof, and determined that the initial verdict was based on a sound and comprehensive assessment of the facts and the applicable law, leading to the conclusion that the appeal lacked merit and should be dismissed.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 433 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO, Art. 62 Abs. 3 StPO; State v. [Defendant's Name] Appeal Dismissal: The appellate court reviewed the evidence presented, including witness testimonies and documentary proof, and determined that the initial verdict was based on a sound and comprehensive assessment of the facts and the applicable law, leading to the conclusion that the appeal lacked merit and should be dismissed.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Kündigung wegen Diebstahls Strafzumessung Beweiswürdigung Einstellung des Strassenverkehrsverfahrens Anfechtbarkeit des Rückweisungsentscheids Zeugenaussage Diebstahl, vorsätzliches Fahren ohne Berechtigung, etc. | Strafgesetzbuch

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
The court confirmed the appeal concerning the criminal penalty, which implies that the ground for appeal regarding the penalty was partially accepted.
Art. 433 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
The court used this article to dismiss the appeal regarding the private party's claim for damages.
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO
The court used this article regarding the costs of the proceedings because the appeal was only partially accepted.
Art. 62 Abs. 3 StPO
The court used this article to assess the distribution of court costs concerning the private party's claim.
KI-generiert
STK 2017 53
State v. Defendant: Appeal of Driving Without License Conviction
STK 2019 36
Prosecution v. Defendant (Driving Without a License Appeal)
STK 2018 41
State v. Defendant (Driving While Impaired Appeal)
STK 2019 60
Appeal of Driving Without License Conviction Upheld
STK 2018 28
State v. [Defendant Name] (Traffic Violation Appeal)

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The court confirmed the appeal concerning the criminal penalty, which implies that the ground for appeal regarding the penalty was partially accepted.

Art. 433 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The court used this article to dismiss the appeal regarding the private party's claim for damages.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO

The court used this article regarding the costs of the proceedings because the appeal was only partially accepted.

Art. 62 Abs. 3 StPO

The court used this article to assess the distribution of court costs concerning the private party's claim.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 13. September 2018 \n STK 2018 10 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Walter Christen. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n Diebstahl, vorsätzliches Fahren ohne Berechtigung, etc. |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 4. Dezember 2017, SGO 2017 22);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: