Commercial Fraud Conviction Upheld on Appeal
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe appellant was convicted of commercial fraud following a second-instance appeal against a prior judgment. The case revolved around allegations of systematically obtaining financial advantage through deceptive conduct. The court upheld the conviction, implicitly finding sufficient evidence to confirm the elements of habitual or professional fraudulent activity as defined by law, thereby dismissing the appeal against the initial verdict.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertCommercial Fraud Conviction Upheld on Appeal: The case revolved around allegations of systematically obtaining financial advantage through deceptive conduct. The court upheld the conviction, implicitly finding sufficient evidence to confirm the elements of habitual or professional fraudulent activity as defined by law, thereby dismissing the appeal against the initial verdict.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Urteil vom 27. September 2017 \n STK 2017 7 \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Pius Schuler, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, \n amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n gewerbsmässiger Betrug (2. Rechtsgang) |\n \n\n
\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 24. Juli 2014, \n SGO 2013 36);-